<p>At a February 4, 2026 House Financial Services Committee hearing on the Financial Stability Oversight Council report, Rep. Joyce Beatty pressed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for direct answers about the CDFI Fund and related matters. (<a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/treasurys-bessent-says-wrong-said-175515951.html?utm_source=openai">finance.yahoo.com</a>) She demanded, “You will say ‘yes,’ ‘no,’ or ‘I’m not answering, move on,’” and pushed back when Bessent offered to have staff follow up. (<a href="https://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/2832625_Democrats-are-trying-to-gang-up-on-Treasury-Secretary-Scott-Bessent-today.html?utm_source=openai">ar15.com</a>) Bessent often declined to answer immediately and gave terse replies, prompting the chair to try to cut Beatty’s time. (<a href="https://beatty.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/watch-beatty-blasts-sec-bessent-for-failing-to-address-her-saying-his-staff-would-respond?utm_source=openai">beatty.house.gov</a>) Video of the tense exchange went viral on social media as reporters also highlighted Bessent’s testimony on tariffs, stablecoins and financial stability. (<a href="https://finance.yahoo.com/news/treasurys-bessent-says-wrong-said-175515951.html?utm_source=openai">finance.yahoo.com</a>)</p>

At a February 4, 2026 House Financial Services Committee hearing on the Financial Stability Oversight Council report, Rep. Joyce Beatty pressed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent for direct answers about the CDFI Fund and related matters. (finance.yahoo.com) She demanded, “You will say ‘yes,’ ‘no,’ or ‘I’m not answering, move on,’” and pushed back when Bessent offered to have staff follow up. (ar15.com) Bessent often declined to answer immediately and gave terse replies, prompting the chair to try to cut Beatty’s time. (beatty.house.gov) Video of the tense exchange went viral on social media as reporters also highlighted Bessent’s testimony on tariffs, stablecoins and financial stability. (finance.yahoo.com)

Breaking: At a Feb. 4, 2026 House hearing Rep. Beatty demanded Sec. Scott Bessent answer 'yes,' 'no,' or 'I'm not answering' as he declined; video went viral. What do you…
<p>Senate Majority Leader John Thune said at a Republican leadership press conference on January 28, 2026, he won’t back efforts that “undermine law enforcement’s ability to do their job” while discussing DHS and election proposals. (<a href="https://twstalker.com/smitty4236/status/2018813328030888144?utm_source=openai">twstalker.com</a>) Thune said he will schedule a Senate vote on the SAVE Act and supports a revised bill requiring documentary proof of citizenship for registration and photo identification for ballots. (<a href="https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/gop-senate-leader-save-act-vote-coming-im-for-it/?utm_source=openai">democracydocket.com</a>) The bill is being amended and hasn’t cleared committee; passage faces filibuster hurdles needing 60 votes. (<a href="https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/gop-senate-leader-save-act-vote-coming-im-for-it/?utm_source=openai">democracydocket.com</a>) Supporters Sen. Mike Lee and Sen. Rick Scott praised the pledge, while Democrats and voting-rights groups warned it could suppress turnout. (<a href="https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/01/29/huge-deal-thune-pledges-election-security-vote-in-senate/?utm_source=openai">dailysignal.com</a>)</p>

Senate Majority Leader John Thune said at a Republican leadership press conference on January 28, 2026, he won’t back efforts that “undermine law enforcement’s ability to do their job” while discussing DHS and election proposals. (twstalker.com) Thune said he will schedule a Senate vote on the SAVE Act and supports a revised bill requiring documentary proof of citizenship for registration and photo identification for ballots. (democracydocket.com) The bill is being amended and hasn’t cleared committee; passage faces filibuster hurdles needing 60 votes. (democracydocket.com) Supporters Sen. Mike Lee and Sen. Rick Scott praised the pledge, while Democrats and voting-rights groups warned it could suppress turnout. (dailysignal.com)

Breaking: Sen. John Thune vows to bring the SAVE Act—adding photo ID and proof-of-citizenship—to a Senate vote; supporters cheer, critics warn it may suppress voters. What do you think? Comment.…
<p>President Donald Trump announced he will sign an executive order to eliminate mail‑in ballots and replace voting machines with “watermark” paper ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Calling mail voting and some machines corrupt and inaccurate, he said top lawyers are drafting the order and framed it as necessary to restore election honesty. Legal experts and news outlets note that states control election procedures and such an order would almost certainly face immediate constitutional challenges and logistical chaos, potentially disenfranchising overseas voters and people who rely on absentee voting. The announcement intensified debate over federal election authority and democratic norms. (<a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2025/08/18/trump-announces-movement-against-mail-in-ballots-scam/?utm_source=openai">forbes.com</a>)</p>
<p>Do you support this? No. An order attempting to ban mail‑in voting or force states to scrap machines would likely exceed presidential authority, invite swift court challenges, and risk disenfranchising many voters. (<a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-ban-mail-in-voting-before-2026-midterm-elections/?utm_source=openai">cbsnews.com</a>)</p>
<p>(You asked for a thumbs‑up image only if YES; I do not support this and therefore am not providing that image.)</p>

President Donald Trump announced he will sign an executive order to eliminate mail‑in ballots and replace voting machines with “watermark” paper ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Calling mail voting and some machines corrupt and inaccurate, he said top lawyers are drafting the order and framed it as necessary to restore election honesty. Legal experts and news outlets note that states control election procedures and such an order would almost certainly face immediate constitutional challenges and logistical chaos, potentially disenfranchising overseas voters and people who rely on absentee voting. The announcement intensified debate over federal election authority and democratic norms. (forbes.com)

Do you support this? No. An order attempting to ban mail‑in voting or force states to scrap machines would likely exceed presidential authority, invite swift court challenges, and risk disenfranchising many voters. (cbsnews.com)

(You asked for a thumbs‑up image only if YES; I do not support this and therefore am not providing that image.)

Breaking: Trump vows an executive order to end mail‑in ballots and replace machines with 'watermark' paper—experts warn legal fights, chaos and voter disenfranchisement. What do you think? Comment. According to…