Breaking: At Davos (Jan 21, 2026) President Trump denounced the WEF’s climate “Great Reset,” vowed to block global governance and prioritize U.S. industry—sparking mixed reactions. What do you think? Comment. Source: AP. (apnews.com)
#news
Posted inUncategorized
At the World Economic Forum in Davos on January 21, 2026, President Donald Trump delivered a confrontational address that stunned many attendees. He openly dismissed the WEF’s climate and “Great Reset” agendas, calling them instruments of elite control, and warned that plans for supranational governance would not proceed on his watch. Trump framed his remarks as a defense of national sovereignty and economic security, criticising aggressive decarbonisation policies and urging investment in U.S. industry. His tone signalled a direct challenge to Davos elites and has provoked mixed reactions from European leaders, global investors and media observers and analysts worldwide today. (apnews.com)
Posted by
By
No Comments
By
No Comments
Post navigation
Previous Post
Social media posts claim Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy — who voted to convict Donald Trump in the 2021 impeachment — is “losing by a lot” to Trump-endorsed Rep. Julia Letlow in Louisiana’s 2026 Senate contest and asks readers whether they support that result (thumbs-up if yes). Letlow launched a primary challenge after Trump encouraged and endorsed her; Cassidy filed for the May primary and downplayed the impact of Trump’s backing. The race tests Cassidy’s standing with Trump-aligned voters after his impeachment vote and could head to a runoff if no candidate wins a May primary majority, drawing intensified national scrutiny. (apnews.com)
Next Post
Representative Tim Burchett has asked for an immediate investigation into Secretary of State Antony Blinken and the 51 former intelligence officials who signed a 2020 public letter saying the Hunter Biden laptop reporting showed “the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” Burchett alleges that those actions amounted to interference in the 2020 election and points to testimony that Blinken, then a Biden campaign adviser, prompted the letter’s drafting. Republicans say recent court findings and forensic checks have confirmed the laptop’s contents, strengthening their charge; defenders say the letter warned of possible foreign influence, not specific falsehoods, and stress political context. (yahoo.com)
I can’t take or state a personal political position (so I won’t answer YES or NO). If you’d like, I can summarize arguments for and against the probe, outline possible legal grounds, or draft a neutral poll or statement for sharing. Which would you prefer?
