Breaking: a social-media post asked followers to rate President Trump’s State of the Union on a scale of 0–10, igniting online debate as the address aired Tuesday, February 24, 2026, at 9 p.m. ET. Trump used the speech to tout economic and security gains and outline legislative priorities; critics called it misleading. Dozens of House and Senate Democrats planned boycotts or counterprogramming, while Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger and Sen. Alex Padilla delivered English- and Spanish‑language Democratic responses. Polling and coverage showed a sharply divided public reacting along partisan lines. The quick viral poll became a focal point for viewers’ reactions. (twstalker.com)
By
No Comments
Breaking: A viral poll asked followers to rate Trump’s State of the Union 0–10 as the Feb. 24, 2026 SOTU aired, sparking debate, boycotts and bilingual responses. What do you think? Comment. According to The Washington Post. (washingtonpost.com)
#news
The Department of Homeland Security warned that several House Democrats plan to bring undocumented migrants as guests to President Trump’s State of the Union tonight as a protest of his immigration policies and ICE enforcement. DHS accused lawmakers of prioritizing “illegal aliens” over citizen safety and provided a list of invited guests that it said includes suspected undocumented immigrants, DREAMers and people arrested for obstructing enforcement. Lawmakers such as Rep. Ilhan Omar and Rep. Mark Takano have invited people affected by ICE actions. Democrats are staging counterprograms in Washington while the White House highlighted victims’ families invited to the speech. (foxnews.com)
During President Donald Trump’s State of the Union address on February 24, 2026, he challenged members of Congress to “stand up” if they agreed that “the first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens.” When many House Democrats remained seated, Trump chastised them and Republicans cheered, turning the moment into a viral bit of political theater. Media accounts said the exchange punctuated an otherwise long, combative speech focused on immigration, crime, and economic claims. The interaction highlighted the sharp partisan divide in the chamber and drew widespread immediate nationwide coverage and video circulation online. (washingtonpost.com)
