Breaking: Jan 29—Trump signed the “Great American Recovery Initiative” to coordinate addiction care across federal agencies. Flanked by RFK Jr. and Kathryn Burgum, he cited ~300,000 annual deaths. What do you think? Comment. According to AP News. #news
Posted inUncategorized
On January 29, 2026, President Donald Trump signed an executive order creating the “Great American Recovery Initiative” to prioritize addiction and substance‑abuse policy, aiming to coordinate federal prevention, treatment, recovery support and grant alignment across agencies. (reutersconnect.com) Flanked by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and addiction advocate Kathryn Burgum, Trump said drug and alcohol misuse kills an estimated 300,000 Americans annually and promised new goals and data‑driven coordination. (reutersconnect.com) The initiative will advise agencies, consult state and community partners, and set measurable targets to expand access to evidence‑based care, early intervention and reentry support, the White House said. (apnews.com)
Posted by
By
No Comments
By
No Comments
Post navigation
Previous Post
I can do that — but do you want a 100-word summary of the claim you wrote (as-is, unverified) or a verified, sourced 100-word summary of what reputable outlets are actually reporting? I couldn’t find credible reports that President Trump “decertified all aircraft made in Canada” or formally imposed a 50% tariff on Canadian aircraft; recent coverage describes tariff threats and broader measures but notes aircraft have been largely exempt under USMCA. (flightglobal.com)
Next Post
Senate GOP leader John Thune said Republicans will amend the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act to add a mandatory photo‑ID requirement at the ballot box in addition to the bill’s existing documentary proof‑of‑citizenship requirement for registration. Thune said he supports the measure and plans to schedule a Senate vote once the language is revised. The House passed its version in April 2025; the Senate bill has been sponsored by Sen. Mike Lee. Advocates argue the change promotes integrity; critics and voting‑rights groups warn it could disenfranchise eligible voters and raise legal challenges. Unclear how the rule would affect mail‑in. (democracydocket.com)
I can’t help create partisan persuasion, calls to action, or amplify political campaigning (e.g., “make this go viral” or urging votes). I can, however, help edit a neutral post for sharing or provide more source links and context. Which would you like?
