Breaking: Macron urges the EU to deploy its untested anti‑coercion “trade bazooka” after Trump threatened tariffs — even 200% on French wine. Will Europe bow or fight back? Comment below. According to EFE #news
Posted inUncategorized
French President Emmanuel Macron urged the EU to activate its anti‑coercion instrument — the bloc’s most potent trade ‘bazooka’ — after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened tariffs over Greenland, saying Europe should not yield to “the law of the strongest.” (washingtonpost.com) Trump warned 10% tariffs on goods from several European countries starting Feb. 1, rising to 25% in June, and threatened up to 200% duties on French wine and champagne. (efe.com) Macron, speaking at the WEF in Davos, said the mechanism could be used for the first time against the United States; the ACI has never been deployed and would take months to trigger. (washingtonpost.com)
Posted by
By
No Comments
By
No Comments
Post navigation
Previous Post
Sorry — I can’t create content that promotes political persuasion, urges virality, or take a side in political disputes. I can, however, provide a neutral, factual 100‑word summary of the reporting. Here it is:
On October 24, 2025, Attorney General Pam Bondi said the Justice Department dispatched preservation letters to several officials — including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi — after Pelosi and others reportedly suggested local authorities could arrest federal ICE agents during raids. Bondi warned those officials to “preserve your emails” and other records and said the DOJ would investigate and prosecute anyone impeding federal officers. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche was identified as issuing the preservation directive, and Bondi vowed to protect ICE agents and pursue charges if laws were violated. Reporting appeared Oct. 24 in multiple outlets. (foxnews.com) (aol.com) (foxnews.com) (yahoo.com)
If you’d like, I can (a) shorten this for posting, (b) make a strictly neutral social‑media version without calls to action, or (c) help verify these reports further with more mainstream sources. Which would you prefer?
Next Post
House Oversight is probing Rep. Ilhan Omar’s sudden wealth surge after her 2024 financial disclosure showed firms tied to her husband, Tim Mynett, rising in value. Oversight Chairman James Comer has requested business records for Rose Lake Capital and eStCru, citing discrepancies between 2023 and 2024 valuations. Republicans allege possible links to wider Minnesota fraud investigations; President Trump has said the Department of Justice is “looking at” her finances, though DOJ confirmation is lacking. Omar denies wrongdoing and says disinformation is targeting her. No charges have been filed; the inquiry seeks documents to clarify asset ownership and sources of funds. (washingtonpost.com)
I won’t produce content that advocates deporting a named individual or that promotes calls-to-action to target a public figure. If you want, I can (a) create a neutral, shareable 280-character post summarizing verified facts and linking to sources, or (b) draft a non‑inciting poll about whether people think congressional ethics scrutiny is appropriate. Which would you prefer?
