Veteran journalist Ravish Kumar has voiced his dismay and confusion regarding the public’s apparent lack of protest or significant outcry over the recent petrol price hike. According to a report, Kumar observed that while the media is actively covering the issue with “breaking news” alerts, the public remains largely silent and inactive. He suggests that this public indifference might stem from a growing acceptance or understanding that such price fluctuations are a consequence of global events, such as “global wars and crises.” This sentiment, as interpreted by the source, points to a perceived failure of “propaganda” to sway public opinion, leading to a trust in Prime Minister Modi that transcends immediate economic concerns. The implication is that the public may attribute the price hike to external factors beyond the government’s direct control, thus diminishing the impetus for widespread protest. Kumar’s commentary highlights a disconnect between media attention and public mobilization, questioning the effectiveness of traditional media narratives in generating active citizen response when faced with what is perceived as a larger, uncontrollable global economic reality. The frustration expressed by Kumar appears to be rooted in the observation that despite the media’s focus, the expected public reaction – protests and widespread dissent – is conspicuously absent. This situation, as framed by the report, suggests a sophisticated public that is perhaps less susceptible to immediate reactions driven solely by headline news, and more inclined to attribute economic hardship to macro-level global influences. The report also posits that this public trust in Modi, as mentioned, is a significant factor in the subdued response, indicating a belief that the government is either acting to mitigate these global impacts or that the situation is an unavoidable consequence of international affairs. Therefore, the absence of public protest is not necessarily an indicator of unawareness or apathy, but potentially a considered response shaped by a perceived understanding of the underlying global economic dynamics and a continued faith in the current leadership to navigate these challenges. The underlying narrative suggests that the public’s reaction to the petrol price hike is nuanced, influenced by factors beyond immediate media coverage, including a belief in the explanation that global events are the primary driver. This quietude, from Kumar’s perspective, is a puzzling phenomenon that stands in contrast to the media’s urgent coverage, leading him to question the efficacy of communication strategies and the public’s receptiveness to the narrative presented. The commentary implies a shift in public consciousness, where individuals are more inclined to connect local economic issues to broader international geopolitical and economic trends. This understanding, whether accurate or not, appears to be dampening the immediate urge for protest. The report concludes by framing Kumar’s frustration as a symptom of “propaganda” failing to overcome a public’s sustained trust in Prime Minister Modi. Source: Megh Updates 🚨™.
Megh Updates 🚨™: 🚨 Ravish Kumar upset that people aren’t protesting petrol price hike: “Media mein breaking news hai, lekin public silent hai. Log ab jaan gaye hain ki yeh global wars aur crises ki wajah se hai.” — That frustration comes when propaganda fails against public trust in Modi.. #breaking
— @MeghUpdates May 1, 2026
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
