By | June 11, 2026

The Hormuz Letter reports a rapidly escalating round of military action in the Middle East, centered on claims by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) that it launched large-scale strikes against U.S. military targets across multiple locations overnight. According to the report, the IRGC says it carried out attacks in two major waves using a combination of ballistic missiles and drones.

The text describes the alleged operations as spanning five separate bases. It presents the strikes as coordinated and timed, with the first wave and a second follow-on wave occurring within the same overnight window. The report emphasizes the scope of the claimed activity and frames it as a direct confrontation with U.S. military assets.

A key detail in the update focuses on Jordan’s Al-Azraq Air Base. The story states that Iran used ballistic missiles to hit and destroy aircraft hangars at the facility. Specifically, it claims that the hangars for multiple U.S. aircraft types were destroyed, naming F-35, F-15, and F-16 hangars. The report characterizes these as a significant operational blow, since hangars are typically associated with aircraft maintenance, readiness, and storage—meaning their destruction could disrupt sortie generation and repair timelines.

The report continues by indicating that similar attacks were carried out in Bahrain as part of the alleged five-base operation. While the provided excerpt does not include granular detail for each Bahrain target, it clearly signals that Bahrain was among the locations struck and that additional U.S.-linked military infrastructure was affected. Together with the mention of Jordan, this suggests the strikes were not limited to a single country but instead targeted basing regions across the area.

In addition to the missile strike claims, the story references drone activity as part of the two large waves. The combined use of drones and ballistic missiles is presented as a feature of the operation—drones typically being used for reconnaissance, surveillance, diversion, or as stand-in munitions—while ballistic missiles are associated with high-impact strikes on hardened or high-value targets. The report’s framing implies the IRGC aimed to maximize disruption by layering different types of delivery and engagement methods.

The narrative is written as an urgent breaking update, reflecting uncertainty and fast-moving information. However, the account itself is structured around specific IRGC statements and location-based claims rather than broader background context. It asserts that the IRGC “announces” it struck dozens of U.S. military targets, reinforcing the claim that the action involved multiple engagements and potentially wide-ranging damage.

The mention of “dozens” of targets suggests the attacks were not limited to a single strike point or facility but instead distributed across several sites, consistent with the earlier claim of five bases being involved. This, in turn, indicates an effort to spread effects across operational hubs, increasing the difficulty of immediate recovery.

The report’s focus on specific aircraft models—F-35, F-15, and F-16—adds clarity about the kind of military capability the alleged strikes were intended to impact. By naming these aircraft types, the story suggests the targeted assets were central to air power projection and readiness. Destroying hangars associated with these aircraft could have longer-term operational consequences beyond immediate physical damage.

The excerpt ends as it transitions to further details about the situation in Bahrain, implying that additional information follows beyond what is included here. Still, even within the limited text, the core message is clear: Iran’s IRGC, as reported by the outlet, claims a major retaliatory or coercive action against U.S. military installations, conducted with ballistic missiles and drones, including strikes in Jordan that purportedly destroyed hangars for multiple fighter aircraft variants.

As with many breaking reports involving active conflict, readers should treat the claims as unverified at this stage unless independently confirmed by official statements or on-the-ground evidence. The report nevertheless provides a concise snapshot of what is being alleged, where it is alleged to have happened, and which kinds of assets were claimed to be hit.

Source: Hormuz Letter

News Source
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.


SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *