By | June 11, 2026

President Donald Trump, speaking in a Fox News segment framed as breaking news, claimed that the United States would strike Iran “VERY HARD TONIGHT.” In the remarks, Trump asserted that key elements of the Iranian military and supporting systems are already largely incapacitated. He specifically said that Iran’s Navy and Air Force are “GONE,” and he also claimed that the country’s radar and air defenses, along with much of its offensive capability, have been eliminated.

The statement was presented as a major escalation in U.S.-Iran tensions, with Trump describing the purported readiness of the strike effort and emphasizing that Iran’s ability to respond has been significantly reduced. Rather than focusing on diplomatic steps, the comments centered on the immediate likelihood of military action and the supposed effectiveness of prior measures, with Trump arguing that the window for Iranian retaliation is extremely limited because many of the systems needed to defend or project force are no longer functional.

Alongside claims about Iranian military capabilities, Trump also discussed potential targets tied to Iran’s economic and strategic infrastructure. He floated the idea of taking Kharg Island, which is closely associated with Iran’s oil and energy exports. Kharg Island is commonly referenced in discussions of Iranian maritime energy production, and Trump’s mention suggested a strategy that would not only affect military assets but also disrupt revenue streams and operational capacity related to oil handling and export.

Trump’s comments, as presented in the news framing, extended to other oil infrastructure points as well, implying that the U.S. focus could include critical nodes beyond battlefield forces. This would represent a broader approach aimed at undermining both Iran’s capacity to sustain military operations and its ability to benefit economically from oil exports during a conflict.

The remarks were delivered in a high-intensity, urgency-driven context typical of breaking news coverage, and the Fox News presentation characterized the comments as a direct message about timing and scale. By stating that the strike would occur “tonight,” Trump appeared to emphasize immediacy, conveying that whatever planning and preparation had occurred had reached a stage where action is imminent.

While Trump’s claims about Iran’s readiness and remaining capabilities were central, the reported discussion also underscored how the narrative of “complete” removal of multiple systems would shape public expectations and the perceived confidence behind the decision to use force. Saying Iran’s radar, air defenses, and multiple branches of military capability are “GONE” suggests an assessment that Iranian forces would be unable to detect, track, or counter U.S. operations effectively.

At the same time, the mention of oil infrastructure targets such as Kharg Island signals an intention to go beyond conventional strikes against military hardware. Targeting energy-related locations can have ripple effects that extend to export flows, market confidence, and Iran’s broader ability to finance state and military activities. Trump’s comments indicated that any conflict response could be designed to impose economic pressure while simultaneously neutralizing military threats.

The Fox News segment framing the remarks also highlights how political messaging can intertwine with military strategy in real time. Trump’s language combined operational claims (about Iranian systems being destroyed) with strategic suggestions (about taking energy infrastructure points) in a way that positions U.S. action as both decisive and comprehensive.

Overall, the story centers on Trump’s assertion that the U.S. intends to carry out a major strike against Iran “tonight,” supported by his claim that Iran’s key military and defensive systems—including Navy, Air Force, radar, and air defenses—have already been removed. Additionally, Trump suggested that the U.S. could seek control of Kharg Island and other oil infrastructure locations, indicating potential economic and strategic objectives alongside military ones.

Source: Fox News

News Source
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.


SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *