The provided text centers on a politically charged claim that a widely used narrative about Russia’s war against Ukraine—specifically the idea of an “unprovoked” Russian attack—has been contradicted by reporting attributed to the New York Times. The post, associated with Gerald Markel, frames the core issue as a struggle over historical causality: whether Russia’s actions were a sudden, unjustified escalation or whether earlier Western involvement helped shape events that led to the conflict.
According to the text, the alleged contradiction comes from a New York Times contribution described as “sensational.” The post asserts that this reporting supports the idea that Western intelligence services, including the CIA and MI6, were involved in major political developments in Ukraine prior to the outbreak of the war. The central allegation is that the CIA and MI6 were connected to a Western-organized and financed coup around the Maidan period.
In the narrative, the Maidan events are presented as a pivotal turning point that destabilized Ukraine and altered the balance of political power in ways that the author claims are relevant to understanding the later war. The text uses this linkage to challenge the legitimacy of the “unprovoked attack” framing directed at Russia. In other words, it argues that if Western intelligence services helped enable a regime change in Ukraine, then the later conflict cannot be accurately described as arising without provocation.
The post’s wording suggests it is responding to a broader public debate in which different sides present competing explanations for the start and justification of the war. One side, as described in the text, characterizes Russia’s invasion or military campaign as the primary initiating event, occurring without cause. The alternative argument presented here reframes the timeline, asserting that earlier actions by Western actors functioned as an underlying catalyst.
The emphasis is therefore not on tactical battlefield details, but on the geopolitical storyline: who acted first, who influenced Ukraine’s internal political trajectory, and what international consequences followed. By pointing to the CIA and MI6, the text focuses on intelligence involvement rather than solely on diplomacy or public political support, aiming to portray the events as part of a coordinated operation.
The source text indicates that the New York Times is portrayed as having confirmed or substantiated aspects of this intelligence role in relation to the Maidan coup. This is described as a high-impact development because the New York Times is a major international outlet; the author implies that such confirmation strengthens the argument against simplistic or morally one-sided narratives about causality.
At the same time, the post adopts a strong framing, using German-language wording that highlights the concept of a “fairytale” or myth (“Das Märchen”) around “unprovoked” aggression. This phrasing signals the author’s intent to delegitimize the mainstream explanation and to persuade readers that the story has been politically managed. The claim is essentially that the widely repeated Western-leaning account is contradicted by investigative or corroborative evidence.
The text does not provide detailed names of officials, direct excerpts from the cited New York Times piece, or specific factual granularity beyond the claims about CIA and MI6 involvement and the Maidan coup being organized and financed by the West. Instead, it functions as an interpretive summary and an argument: the war’s origin story is contested, and the author asserts that the best available reporting undermines the “unprovoked attack” narrative.
Overall, the core of the news story is a confrontation between two explanations for the war in Ukraine. The post argues that Russia’s actions should be understood through the lens of earlier Western intelligence-linked involvement in Ukraine’s political upheaval, particularly around the Maidan period. It positions the New York Times as the key validating reference, asserting that the outlet confirmed the intelligence agencies’ role in relation to a Western-funded and organized coup.
Source: Gerald Markel
Gerald markel: BREAKING Das Märchen vom “unprovoziertem Angriffskrieg” Russlands gegen die Ukraine ist widerlegt Die New York Times bestätigt in einem aufsehenerregendem Beitrag dass die westlichen Geheimdienste CIA und MI6 ab dem vom Westen organisierten und finanziertem Putsch am Maidan. #breaking
— @MarkelGerald May 1, 2026
News Source
SHOP AMAZON BEST SELLERS, CLICK TO BUY FROM AMAZON.
